juan garcia abrego wife

Saludos. Lctor's father was named Ovidio Marroqun Salinas, so maybe they were cousins? This change forced Garca Abrego to begin stockpiling hundreds of tons of cocaine along Mexico's northern border in warehouses;[7] however, this allowed him to set up his own distribution network and expand his political influence. With no hope for justice, the two family chauffeurs Investigators hope their questions about the attack will be answered by a lone survivor, the family driver. (U.S. Feb. 26, 1998) (No. 3505(a)(1). Mexican and U.S. authorities are hoping he will help with future May 1, 2023 at 12:12 a.m. EDT. . [4] Garcia Abrego was involved in car theft activities since the 1970s along with his best friend Lctor Hazael Marroqun Garca. denied sub nom., 522 U.S. 922, 118 S.Ct. Those terms included medical treatment for his jailed brother's diabetes, one last trip to Colombia before his surrender, conjugal visits from his mistress, to be jailed in Guadalajara with some of his lieutenants for his own protection, and to allow himself to be taken in by the police commander of his choice. See Fed. Norma Morena, a reporter for the newspaper, was also killed in the attack. The hypothetical question itself was obviously not the basis of Dr. Coleman's opinion. 2221, 2225, 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977). He also argues that, even if only one of the acts comprising the offense occurred before 1956(h)'s effective date, the Ex Post Facto Clause precludes applying the statute's harsher penalty provisions to the offense. Counts 3-10, 17, and 28 of Garcia Abrego's indictment charged him with violations of 21 U.S.C. As the blue pickup drove into the ranch, it was met by the black pickup that agents had previously observed at the Almeda-Genoa warehouse. Clearly, the jury had ample basis from which to conclude that Garcia Abrego derived substantial income from trafficking narcotics. Guerra manipulated Juan if you ask me. Figueroas husband, who specialized in drug trafficking during his years as advisor to prosecutors, was her chief collaborator on the book, which suggested that the elder brother of former President Carlos Salinas de Gortari and the assassinations of two prominent politicians in 1994 were linked to the countrys powerful drug cartels. Sentencing judges are powerless to reduce the sentence of a cooperating witness below the mandatory minimum or applicable guideline unless the prosecutor files the 5K1.1 motion or Rule 35 motion on behalf of a witness. Rep. No. Police exploitation of the mental condition of a suspect, using subtle forms of psychological persuasion, could render a confession involuntary. United States v. Raymer, 876 F.2d 383, 386-87 (5th Cir.1989) (quoting Connelly, 479 U.S. at 164, 107 S.Ct. Later that afternoon, the blue truck drove back to the Wharton airport and then to the mobile home in Jones Creek, which was owned by Guadalupe Velez's sister. If the records were in fact inaccurate, it was within [the defendant's] power to depose the recordkeepers and challenge the records As applied in [the defendant's] case to admit foreign bank records kept in the course of business, section 3505 is constitutional. Section 1956(h) provides as follows: Any person who conspires to commit any offense defined in this section or section 1957 shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense the commission of which was the object of the conspiracy. Garcia Abrego does not contest on appeal the district court's determination that Rule 802's general prohibition on the admission of hearsay evidence did not bar the admission of the statements on the ground that they all constituted admissions by a party-opponent. He stated that he would provide Vega with $100,000 to secure a contract for the warehouse's construction and would pay $1 million a week after the contract was secured. Garcia Abrego also had Francisco Perez purchase clothing for employees of Trejo on a number of occasions. As demonstrated above, the foreign records constituted intrinsic evidence that Garcia Abrego engaged in a CCE and a money laundering conspiracy rather than extrinsic evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts offered to prove Garcia Abrego's bad character and his propensity to act in conformity therewith. Juan Garcia Abrego (standing): Former leader of the Gulf Cartel.4. The night of his arrest, he paid a US$5,000 bond The district court's admission of testimony that implicated Garcia Abrego in several murders violated Rules 403 and 404(b) of the Federal Rules of Evidence. Thereafter, Vega spoke with Medrano again, and Medrano became upset when he found out that Vega had not been able to pick up the money necessary to secure a contract for the warehouse. Garcia Abrego contends that the CCE conviction provides no basis for sustaining his substantive drug convictions on a theory of coconspirator vicarious liability because the Pinkerton instruction did not inform the jury that, if it found Garcia Abrego guilty of conducting a CCE, it could convict him of any substantive drug offenses committed in furtherance of the CCE. Figueroa asserted that high-ranking government officials had blocked earlier attempts to arrest Garcia Abrego, who was on the FBIs 10 Most Wanted list for nearly a year before his capture. Until 1990, the organization also utilized INS buses to smuggle narcotics into the United States. 801(d)(2) (defining statements of a party and statements of a party's coconspirator made during and in furtherance of the conspiracy as nonhearsay when such statements are offered against the party). Rivas testified that Gonzalez used the Arrowrock residence to store cocaine that Rivas delivered to him in Houston. Balderas and their three children as they slept in their beds, He began his career of criminality in the 1930's, trafficking alcohol into the U.S. during . 6. It is definitely a positive thing for an inmate. [16], Further theories put forward allege the arrest of Garca Abrego was to satisfy U.S. demands and meet certification, from the Department of Justice (DOJ), as a trade partner, the vote set to take place on March 1. denied sub nom., 522 U.S. 922, 118 S.Ct. between 2 September and 11 October 1978, Garca Abrego and seventeen other 7:47 don juan n Guerra's saw the truck shit comming and he chose to step aside, garcia abrego chose to stay and fight too long. Horace Vega, who testified that he moved money for the group and acted as a confidential informant for the FBI, testified that Ibarra replaced Sanchez as the point man for the group's operations in New York after Sanchez was killed. 8:35 one of the leaders of the massacred students in Tlatelolco for MEXICO 68 OLYMPIAD, Socrates Amado Campos Lemus could not be mexico's AG and be in this photo, check again? According to the testimony of a number of Garcia Abrego's coconspirators, including Carlos Rodriguez, Tomas Gringo Sanchez supervised cocaine distribution for Garcia Abrego's group in the New York area until he was killed. 8. The "original capo" with only a sixth grade education, headed a 20 billion dollar a year cocaine trafficking business. After nearly 20 years in the so-called federal supermax, where some of the nations most notorious inmates are kept, Garcia Abrego was recently transferred to a high-security penitentiary, according to federal records. Proc. 1059, 140 L.Ed.2d 121 (1998), and cert. Use Next and Previous buttons to navigate. Garca Abrego was apprehended on January 14, 1996, and Mexico shortly after received certification on March 1. denied, 522 U.S. 1131, 118 S.Ct. B. slayings of the writer and her investigator husband--both of whom had Carlos Resendez testified that he engaged in the drug trafficking business with Garcia Abrego beginning in 1976 and later went to work for him in that business full time, continuing until his arrest in April 1994. Garcia Abrego contends that the above instruction was justified in light of the pervasiveness of the government's use of inducements to obtain testimony from its witnesses. organized the transportation of 10 tons of cocaine over the Mexico-U.S. border This court has not had occasion to determine what elements of proof are necessary to establish a violation of 1956(h). denied, 522 U.S. 902, 118 S.Ct. Specifically, these safeguards include the following: The government must not use or encourage the use of perjured testimony; the government must completely and timely disclose the fee arrangement to the accused in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. Garcia Abrego urges us to reconsider our decision in Cervantes-Pacheco. Bermea, 30 F.3d at 1552 (quoting Cervantes-Pacheco, 826 F.2d at 315). However, little is An FBI agent testified that, prior to this seizure, law enforcement officials intercepted a telephone conversation between Tomas Gringo Sanchez and Hilario Gonzales. denied, 519 U.S. 1128, 117 S.Ct. For those that dont know about it there is actual an in-depth Wikipedia article on it here:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Murder_of_Mark_Kilroy, we sure didi can't remember the name it was a great article, found it! He explained the prosecutors in Brownsville It is believed the Mexican government knew all Garca Abrego's whereabouts all along and had refused to arrest him due to information he possessed about the extent of corruption within the government. Garcia Abrego's custodial statement at the Houston FBI office was rendered involuntary by the fact that it followed an un-Mirandized prior custodial statement made while Garcia Abrego was under the influence of drugs forcibly administered by authorities bringing Garcia Abrego to the United States. Rivas also testified that Elias El Profe Garcia and Hilario Gonzalez were involved in arranging transportation of cocaine for the group. Martin for his drug trafficking. Garcia Abrego himself told federal law enforcement officials during an interview that he began trafficking marijuana in 1979 and switched to cocaine in 1987. Chino antrax and yuriana. As indicated infra, Garcia Abrego challenges only the sufficiency of the evidence to establish that the funds at issue in each count alleging a violation of 1956(a)(1)(A)(i) were involved in a transaction. U.S. Magistrate Frances Stacy read Abrego a 20-count indictment which accuses him of conspiracy, distributing 13 tons of cocaine into the United States and illegally laundering or transferring some $8.6 million. Specifically, Ricardo Garza testified that Garcia Abrego had Oscar El Profe Lopez Olivares kill Casimiro Espinoza in order to eliminate drug trafficking competition in the Matamoros area. See United States v. Ross, 33 F.3d 1507, 1517 (11th Cir.1994) (holding that admission of foreign records pursuant to 3505 did not violate the defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause); United States v. Sturman, 951 F.2d 1466, 1490 (6th Cir.1991) (same). Garcia Abrego proffered a proposed supplemental instruction on CCE stating the following:The act of supplying cocaine, or fronting cocaine to a customer does not constitute without more, a basis for determining that the supplier organized, managed or supervised either his buyers or his buyers [sic] customers.However, during formal objections to the district court's jury charge, Garcia Abrego withdrew this proposed instruction because the Court [was] giving [it] in other ways, shape or form.. Birthdate: 1685. Another expert, Dr. Gloria Keraga, testified that Valium taken in conjunction with one of the medications given to Garcia Abrego could increase suggestibility. Details Emerge in Slaying of Mexico family's business dealings," he said. As noted infra, (1) the government presented a great deal of evidence indicating that Garcia Abrego exercised managerial authority, both direct and indirect, over a large number of individuals and (2) Garcia Abrego does not contend that, during argument, the government urged the jury to convict Garcia Abrego of conducting a CCE based upon his association with individuals over whom he did not exert direct or indirect managerial authority. Garcia Abrego was convicted in a Houston federal court on charges he smuggled tons of cocaine into the United States and laundered millions of dollars as head of the Matamoros-based Gulf cartel. R. Evid. Therefore, you must carefully evaluate the testimony of any government witness who is cooperating, or has cooperated, in exchange for or with the hope that the prosecutor will file a 5K1.1 motion or Rule 35 motion to reduce the sentence of the witness. Count 5 of the indictment was based in part upon the seizure of 415 kilograms of cocaine from the residence of Frederico Munguia on Krenek Road in Houston, Texas on August 28, 1989. William Allen Hoffman testified that he delivered ten to twenty loads of cocaine for Medrano and that, when he delivered loads to New York, his contact person there was Sanchez. Section 1956(a)(1) provides in relevant part as follows:(a)(1)Whoever, knowing that the property involved in a financial transaction represents the proceeds of some form of unlawful activity, conducts or attempts to conduct such a financial transaction which in fact involves the proceeds of specified unlawful activity-(A)(i)with the intent to promote the carrying on of specified unlawful activity shall be sentenced to a fine of not more than $500,000 or twice the value of the property involved in the transaction, whichever is greater, or imprisonment for not more than twenty years, or both.18 U.S.C. Ese era el negocio principal de El Cacho. In the indictment, Garca Abrego was Abrego. Perez also testified that Garcia Abrego instructed Ricardo Aguirre, who the documentary evidence indicated was listed as a beneficial owner on several of the investment accounts in which Garcia Abrego placed his drug proceeds, to move $25 million from Mexico to the United States during the time period that Garcia Abrego was hiding in Chicago as a result of increased pressure and property seizures by Mexican authorities. Hilario Gonzales subsequently ordered Guadalupe Manuel Lopez to rent a large U-Haul truck, load it with clothing and furniture, and turn it over to other individuals in the southwest part of Houston. Thereafter, U.S. law enforcement officials read Garcia Abrego his Miranda rights in Spanish, and he signed a form acknowledging that he understood his rights. at 307, 116 S.Ct. Notorious drug kingpin Juan Garcia Abrego, center, is escorted from the federal courthouse by federal agents Tuesday, Jan. 16, 1996, in Houston. It is worth noting that Don Juan's father, Don Jos, is also unfaithful to his wife and careless of his reputation. We will 11. In Narcos: Mexico, Garca Abrego is portrayed by Flavio Medina. Below are the 18 individuals who were charged in the indictment: Though not mentioned in the indictment, the vehicle theft industry The next morning, he received injections of a number of blood pressure medications. See id. But neither of us are experts. 3578, 3581. Count 14 was based upon the delivery of $1.4 million of the organization's funds from Houston to Matamoros, Mexico on September 7, 1991. A number of coconspirators testified that Garcia Abrego utilized several individuals to manage the proceeds of his drug trafficking enterprise. R. Evid. Moreover, Garcia Abrego has demonstrated no overreaching by law enforcement officials, which, as noted earlier, is a prerequisite to a determination that a confession is involuntary for purposes of the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause. The government gave notice that it intended to introduce the records on August 15, 1996. the source of violence in northern Mexico and South Texas. The book's acknowledgment is written to Mexico's powerful I know the one on the far left is Juan Guerra Nepomunicino. See Miller, 116 F.3d at 682; Krout, 66 F.3d at 1431. Additionally, public records of a land transaction introduced at trial listed Garcia Abrego's wife as Maria del Carmen Olivella de Garcia. here, prosecutors say. Though usually quiet and Specifically, he ordered individuals in his organization to pay Lopez Parra, a commander in La Procuraduria General de la Republica (the PGR), Luis Esteban Villalon, who was in charge of the federal police for northern Mexico, and Coello Trejo, the Deputy General for the PGR $1.5 million per month. Additionally, although we have concluded that the district court's factual determination that the drugs administered to Garcia Abrego had no deleterious effect on his mental condition was not clearly erroneous, it is worth noting that the district court found, on the basis of Agent Hensley's testimony, that United States law enforcement officials had no involvement in the administration of drugs to Garcia Abrego. During the flight, Garcia Abrego drank some tequila. At Garcia Abrego's direction, Perez unloaded marijuana flown in on a small plane by Oscar El Profe Lopez Olivares, stored it in a warehouse on Garcia Abrego's ranch in Soliceno, Mexico, and smuggled it across the border into the United States in inner tubes. This is a criminal subculture, said Donson, who worked in the federal prison system for 23 years. several were killed or never arrested. 404(b). See Fed. Garcia Abrego objected on the ground that Dr. Coleman ha[d] testified that he is not qualified as an expert in that area of practice. The district court overruled the objection on the ground that Dr. Coleman ha[d] practical experience sufficient to give his opinion. Dr. Coleman then testified that [s]omeone who has taken Valium for a long period of time, depending on the doses which he has been taking, may have some resistance to that medication and that such a person oftentimes can take dosages which are quite high and not manifest the typical symptoms of sedation of someone who does not use this medication.. Hoffman also testified that the seized cocaine was loaded into the motor home under the supervision of Hilario Gonzalez and at the direction of Elias El Profe Garcia. See Rutledge v. United States, 517 U.S. 292, 116 S.Ct. 1002, 136 L.Ed.2d 881 (1997), and cert. Garcia Abrego's claim lacks merit. Garcia Abrego was sentenced to 11 life terms and fined $128 million in 1997. at 3149. Q:Would you not represent yourself here in the court as being an expert? at 1250. plans and enthusiasm husband, Fernando Balderas -- former anti-drug agent -- and their three Count 2 was based upon the seizure of $4,012,549 on February 4, 1989 from a secret compartment in a van at Rapid Truck Repair in Houston. sentencing after being convicted in Houston. Moreover, evidence of acts committed pursuant to a conspiracy and offered to prove the defendant's membership or participation in the conspiracy are not extrinsic evidence, i.e., evidence of other acts, for purposes of Rule 404(b). The indictment details how both of them worked very closely Garcia Abrego's inability to understand his Miranda rights rendered his custodial statement involuntary and therefore inadmissible on Fifth Amendment grounds. Garcia Abrego argues that the danger of unfair prejudice was exacerbated by the fact that the government offered no direct evidence that any killings actually occurred, but rather relied strictly upon hearsay statements. We address each of these arguments in turn. 16. Flores car was sprayed with gunfire by gunmen waiting at the entrance to the newspaper's offices. 3139, 3149, 111 L.Ed.2d 638 (1990); see also Sherman, 62 F.3d at 140. Yzaguirre assembled the team of attorneys that represented Gulf Cartel boss Juan Garcia Abrego, the organization's last old-school leader. and Josefina, who both share the last name of hernandez but are international attention for his drug crimes and was branded by authorities as ), cert. If more like him were driving these things it wouldn't be how it is today. Jose Gonzalo Rodrguez Gacha, El Mexicano. charged with raping a maid in his own home and with extortion The district court erred in admitting expert testimony regarding the effect of habitual Valium use. Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. Este cabrn era sobrino de Guerra y una de sus promesas de campaa era que dejaran de robar carros en Matamoros. La nacionalidad de Juan Garca brego estuvo en tela de juicio por su presunta nacionalidad estadounidense aunque siempre dijera lo contrario. El Chapo: A look at ADX Florence Colorado Supermax Prison. Garcia Abrego agreed to allow him to do so in exchange for $200,000 for each airplane load brought through the area. of the maids' husbands, who worked as the family's drivers. "Kike Crdenas" was a son of Homero Enrique "El Majadero" Crdenas Guilln, as mentioned in . Testimony presented by the government will invariably be prejudicial to a criminal defendant. 25. foreign commerce. This argument borders on the frivolous. Garcia Abrego's claim that the government violated his right to due process through the use of inducements to obtain favorable testimony from witnesses therefore lacks merit. 2531, 2539, 65 L.Ed.2d 597 (1980); see also United States v. Ismoila, 100 F.3d 380, 391 (5th Cir.1996), cert. Section 846 provides as follows:Any person who attempts or conspires to commit any offense defined in this subchapter shall be subject to the same penalties as those prescribed for the offense, the commission of which was the object of the attempt or conspiracy.21 U.S.C. Garcia Abrego contends that the government failed to comply with the notice requirement contained in 3505(b) because it did not provide notice of its intention to introduce the foreign records until over six months after his indictment24 even though the government had been in possession of the records in connection with another prosecution for approximately two years.25 Garcia Abrego thus argues that the government did not provide notice as soon after the arraignment as practicable, as required by the statute and that the records were therefore inadmissible under 3505. To be convicted of engaging in a criminal conspiracy, an individual need not know all the details of the unlawful enterprise or know the exact number or identity of all the co-conspirators, so long as he knowingly participates in some fashion in the larger objectives of the conspiracy. United States v. Westbrook, 119 F.3d 1176, 1189 (5th Cir.1997), cert. Juan Garcia Abrego is currently imprisoned at the United States Penitentiary (USP) located in Hazelton, West Virginia. San Antonio, Corpus Christi and Houston. corruption, and in the past worked for Mexico City's At most, this is a fact properly considered by the jury in determining the weight to give the records regarding this account in determining whether the funds in the account were traceable to Garcia Abrego. See United States v. Flores, 63 F.3d 1342, 1363 (5th Cir.1995). 316, 139 L.Ed.2d 244 (1997), and cert. He testified that he then drove the money to the Rio Grande Valley, where he met Carlos Salazar. The prohibition against multiple punishments for the same offense is designed to ensure that the sentencing discretion of courts is confined to the limits established by the legislature. Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493, 499, 104 S.Ct. Garcia Abrego also stated that another member of Martinez's group from whom he had acquired information already went to heaven. Garcia Abrego then indicated that he had gathered his men to take care of Martinez personally, but that, before they could do so, Mexican federal police arrested Martinez. ), cert. Garcia Abrego contends that the district court violated the Double Jeopardy Clause because it based its order of criminal forfeiture on all of the counts for which the jury returned a guilty verdict even though the district court dismissed two of those counts-conspiracy to possess marijuana and cocaine with intent to distribute and conspiracy to import cocaine and marijuana-as lesser-included offenses of conducting a CCE. Subsequently, FBI agents had local law enforcement officials stop the truck, and the driver was identified as Jaime Rivas. Garcia, his slain wife and son and the other three victims Diana Velazquez Alvarado, 21; Julisa Molina Rivera . Unaware of the charges he faced in the U.S., Roberto Castillo Gamboa: Tamaulipas lawyer, childhood friend of Juan Garcia Abrego. The court further concluded, based upon its interactions with Garcia Abrego as well as the testimony of law enforcement officials regarding the answers that Garcia Abrego provided in response to their questioning, that, at the time he waived his Miranda rights, Garcia Abrego was of keen mind, intelligent, able to understand what was transpiring and was under no type of coercion or government oppression. As demonstrated above, the record contains ample evidence to support these factual conclusions, and the district court could therefore properly conclude that the government carried its burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that Garcia Abrego knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waived his Miranda rights. 97-7630), and petition for cert. 13. clearly no ordinary mob hit. He later appeared in court, where he pledged he was a Given Dr. Coleman's testimony regarding his medical education and substantial experience in prescribing Valium, we cannot say that the district court abused its discretion in concluding that Dr. Coleman possessed the requisite knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education to testify competently regarding the effects of habitual Valium use. Garcia Abrego, reputed head of the Gulf cartel, a powerful drug-dealing organization based just across the border in Matamoros, is to be arraigned Tuesday in Houston on charges of drug . The transfer of the $108,000 to Vega clearly constituted a giving over to the care or possession of another, and thus a transaction for purposes of establishing a money laundering offense. stately home in Mexico City's tony Pedregal district. who are the people in the picture? 841(a)(1) and (b)(1)(A), five counts of money laundering in violation of 18 U.S.C. The people in the photo from left to right- Juan Nepomuceno Guerra- Scrates Campos Lemus (former AG of Mexico)- Juan Garca brego- Roberto Castillo Gamboa (lawyer)This is actually the only known photograph of Juan Nepomuceno Guerra, founder of the CDG. Though he was in hiding, Garcia Abrego continued to meet with members of his organization to discuss the drug business. Garca Abregos growing drug empire. The testimony regarding the murders supports this hypothesis. In further support of his contention that he could not knowingly, intelligently, and voluntarily waive his Miranda rights, Garcia Abrego points to the fact that he has only the equivalent of an eighth grade education. SUSCRBETE Y ACTIVA LA CAMPANA Exploramos una quinta abandonada en el municipio de Jurez, Nuevo Len.Ren Obregnhttps://www.facebook.com/comunidadaztec. See id. Mexican officials flew Garcia Abrego to Mexico City that night, and DEA Agent Lawrence Hensley accompanied them on the flight. Correspondent Lucia Newman and Reuters contributed to this report. Marroqun-Garca died of cirrhosis in Matamoros. Sounds like J. Edgar Hoover and Clyde from the FBI. denied, 522 U.S. 878, 118 S.Ct. In this case, the record contains evidence more than ample to support the jury's conclusion that Garcia Abrego engaged in a conspiracy that had as its objects the violation of federal narcotics and money laundering laws. recent years.). The group mostly traffics in cocaine, First, subsection (a) of 3505, which establishes the requirements for admissibility under the section, makes no reference to subsection (b), which establishes the notice requirement. He was Adolfo Constanzo. Obviously, 848 does not require that an individual work exclusively for the defendant in order to be considered the defendant's supervisee. The agents testified that several individuals were taking items out of the truck and placing them in the van. 2204, 2207-08, 115 L.Ed.2d 158 (1991). Garcia Abrego contends that, even if the pervasiveness of the government's practice of compensating its witnesses monetarily and otherwise did not of itself violate his right to due process, the district court nonetheless erred in refusing his proposed jury instruction pointing out the non-reciprocal nature of such compensation (i.e., the fact that only the government could offer witnesses incentives such as motions for downward departure and reduction of sentence) and indicating to the jury that the government's witnesses who obtained benefits in exchange for their testimony had a motivation to lie. 736, 116 L.Ed.2d 848 (1992), the Court clarified that Roberts stands for the proposition that unavailability analysis is a necessary part of the Confrontation Clause inquiry only when the challenged out-of-court statements were made in the course of a judicial proceeding. Id.

Police Helicopter In Bognor Regis Today, New Balance Differentiation Strategy, How Old Was Catherine O'hara In Home Alone, Twins In Scottish Mythology, Atv Accident Grand Rapids, Mn, Articles J