what circumstances lead to the abolishment of terra nullius
: Penguin Books, 1995); Henry Reynolds, The Other Side of the Frontier: Aboriginal Resistance to the European Invasion of Australia (Ringwood, Vic. Britons cannot but feel ourselves delighted at the sight of smiling harvests taking place of naked wastes, applauded one far-off observer, since mans business, as an inhabitant of this world, is to improve and cultivate the face of the earth.[66], Even if terra nullius had been unjust, others argued, there was no point worrying about it because the Aborigines were dying out. How do I acknowledge the Library in my publication? Stan Grant is the ABC's international affairs analyst and presents China Tonight on Monday at 9:35pm on ABC TV, and Tuesday at 8pm on the ABC News Channel, anda co-presenter of Q+A on Thursday at 8:30pm. [36]Terra nullius was virtually uncontested in the early years of colonization, and the Aborigines had no legal standing to contest it, so there was no occasion for any declaration that it was part of the law. When the British Admiralty (Royal Navy) found out where Cook was going, they took advantage of the opportunity to expand the British Empires interests in the Pacific. 0000009848 00000 n James Douglas was the president of the Royal Society. In the nineteenth century, however, such a plan would have deprived the government of what was anticipated to be a major source of revenue, the sale and lease of Crown land. 1. Blighs successor as governor, Lachlan Macquarie, seems to have felt a similar unease. They are frequently set down as too stupid to be taught, and barely raised above brutes, remarked the Reverend Henry William Haygarth. This solution was thought to be a compromise between antislavery activists and slavery supporters. [3] The existence of terra nullius in Australia is thus something of a puzzle. 48. The first Britons in Australia, like Europeans throughout the world, had to size up the people they encountered and make judgments about what they were like, because upon those judgments would rest many of their colonial policies, including policies about land. 0000003198 00000 n Judged by any civilised standard, such a law is unjust ". Lowe could not be prosecuted, his lawyer contended, because Lowe was only punishing Jackey Jackey for a murder Jackey Jackey had committed. It did not take long. achieved many successes, such as the abolition of slavery in the colonies. The land titles of every single landowner in Australia were based on a purchase from the Crown. If the land is indeed their own, he realized, the Colonists of South Australia have no title to their land, for a voluntary surrender of it has never been made. If terra nullius were abandoned, he wondered, and if the Aborigines were to try to reclaim their land, would not the Colonists, as a matter of course, be at once called upon to rise en masse and resist so diabolical an attempt, and would not your newspaper be filled with glowing accounts of the bravery and skill displayed by the Colonists in repelling this atrocious native aggression?[76] The number of landowners in Australia was steadily increasing, and all of themevery single onedepended on terra nullius for the security of their title. Historical Records of Australia (Sydney: Library Committee of the Commonwealth Parliament, 1914), series IV, 1:330. 0000006452 00000 n Words speak across tongues. This sketch, which shows the land divisions of different family groups on Murray Island, formed part of the evidence in the Mabo case. As he and his crew described the newly discovered southern continent, it was different in some critical respects from other places the British had colonized. Debunking the hunter-gatherer label, Pascoe relies on the writing and illustrations of early explorers and colonists to support his argument that Indigenous Australians had lived in settlements, and developed complex agricultural and land-management systems over thousands of years. 0000006890 00000 n I have heard it at dawn as the earth crackles, the river waters run, and the animals stir as the Sun peers above the hills and the light strikes the trees on my beloved Wiradjuri country. He was supposed to seize the land by force. The National Library of Australia acknowledges Australias First Nations Peoples the First Australians as the Traditional Owners and Custodians of this land and gives respect to the Elders past and present and through them to all Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. According to current estimates of the precontact Aboriginal population, between 1 and 1.5 million people were spread over the entire continent. The decision of Justice Richard Blackburn ruled against the Yolngu claimants on a . 33. Did you know? I do not look upon them to be a warlike People, Cook explained. Abolitionism started in states like New York and Massachusetts and quickly spread to other Northern states. 6. When democracy is teetering and autocracy is rising. 0000002851 00000 n 9. Unlike other peoples the British had encountered, the Aborigines seemed to show no interest in British manufactures. ed. He was told instead: You are also with the consent of the natives to take possession of convenient situations in the country in the name of the king of Great Britain, or, if you find the country uninhabited take possession for His Majesty.[7]. It is a gain to the cause of truth and virtue for Christian England to possess those wilds, which lately were occupied by miserable natives, Pridden reasoned; and, while we own that it is wrong to do evil that good may come, yet may we, likewise, confess with thankfulness the Divine mercy and wisdom which have so often brought good out of the evil committed by our countrymen in these distant lands. To say that terra nullius was wrong was only to raise, not to answer, a difficult ethical question. Delve into historical records and learn how the decision was made to establish a colony in Australia. These settlers fought and took the land from the Indigenous people of Australia. Such a society would usurp more extensive territories than, with a reasonable share of labour, they would have occasion for, and have, therefore, no reason to complain, if other nations, more industrious and too closely confined, come to take possession of a part of those lands.[12] In an enormous continent with a tiny population, there would be plenty of unowned land available for the taking. 0000008513 00000 n Gerard Brennan, 1928 - 2022. The golden house of is collapses and the world of becoming ascended.". 31. The Origin of Hotdogs, The History of Boracay Island in The Philippines. In the mind of an educated Englishman, property in land went along with agriculture. Historical Records of Australia, series IV, 1:414. As Henry Knox, the United Statess first Secretary of War, advised Congress, it may be wise to extinguish with a small sum of money, a claim which otherwise may cost much blood and infinitely more money. The British government was accordingly interested to hear whether the Aborigines would put up much resistance to the occupation of Australia. [4] Yet at the end of this period terra nullius was as firmly a part of the law as ever. W. G. Shepherd (Middlesex: Penguin Books, 1983), 155; Julius Caesar, The Gallic War, trans. One of the advantages of this site, explained the government committee responsible for choosing the location of the penal colony, was that it was highly probable that the Natives would without resistance acquiesce in ceding as much land as may be necessary for a stipulated rent.[9] In the end, Das Voltas Bay was rejected too, and the government turned to Australia. The Mabo Case was successful in overturning the myth that at the time of colonisation Australia was 'terra nullius . Reversing terra nullius would have posed a terrible administrative problem for settlers and their government. The British treated Australia as terra nulliusas unowned land. To Eddie Koiki Mabo and chief justice Sir Gerard Brennan. : Melbourne University Press, 1990), 3751; Sylvia J. Hallam, Fire and Hearth: A Study of Aboriginal Usage and European Usurpation in South-Western Australia (Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies, 1979), 4143. B. Knight and Alan Frost, eds., The Journal of Daniel Paine, 17941797 (Sydney: Library of Australian History, 1983), 39; Watkin Tench, A Complete Account of the Settlement at Port Jackson (London, 1793), reprinted in Tench, Sydneys First Four Years, 281; Thomas MCombie, Australian Sketches, 2d ed. Had Australia not been a penal colony, the first British settlers might have been scattered missionaries and whalers, who would have been less able than the government to seize Aboriginal land by force. On the Contrary I think them a timorous and inoffensive race, no ways inclinable to Cruelty. The government committee responsible for choosing a location for the new penal colony asked Banks directly: Do you think that 500 Men being put on shore there would meet with that Obstruction from the Natives which might prevent their settling there? Banks replied: Certainly not. He predicted that they would speedily abandon the Country to the New Comers.[20] Not long after this colloquy, the government of the United States would begin purchasing land from nomadic, nonagricultural tribes on the North American plains, in part because of the long American tradition of obtaining Indian land by purchase, but also in part because of the calculation described by Henry Knox. 35. Create your own unique website with customizable templates. 53. He lived with Torres Strait Islander people, entering Country the right way and respecting local culture. Invasion Day 2011Invasion Day 2011Invasion Day 2018Uncle Gordon Syron, Worimi, BirpaiOil on canvas. All human societies had begun in the state of nature, but most of them had progressed since then, and one of the ways in which they had progressed was by assigning property rights in land. Abolition and the Abolitionists. When there were [n]o ploughshares to break up the landscape, Ovid agreed, there were no surveyors [p]egging out the boundaries of estates.[17] Humans had once been wanderers, without property in land, but when they settled down and began farming, they simultaneously established property rights. Alex C. Castles, An Australian Legal History (Sydney: Law Book Co., 1982), 23; Historical Records of New South Wales, 1(2):87; Alan Frost, New South Wales as Terra nullius: The British Denial of Aboriginal Land Rights, Historical Studies 19 (1981): 51323; Robert J. As John Bede Polding, the Roman Catholic Archbishop of Sydney, urged in 1845, if it is necessary for the purposes of civilized life, to occupy his land, the government should see that it is not taken away without remuneration.[71]. Watch him speak about his work in the 2018 Eric Rolls Memorial Lecture at the Library. 65. One marine called them the most wretched of the human race; another the most miserable of Gods creatures; a carpenter found them the most miserable of the human form under heaven. William Anderson, the surgeon on Cooks last voyage, opined that with respect to personal activity or genius we can say but little of either. Anderson was hardly alone. Most early abolitionists were white, religious Americans, but some of the most prominent leaders of the movement were also Black men and women who had escaped from bondage. In 1833, a white student at Lane Theological Seminary named Amos Dresser was publicly whipped in Nashville, Tennessee, for possessing abolitionist literature while traveling through the city. HISTORY.com works with a wide range of writers and editors to create accurate and informative content. Historians believe ideas set forth during the religious movement known as the Second Great Awakening inspired abolitionists to rise up against slavery. This is an edited extract of the 2022 Mabo Lecture, delivered by Stan Grant on June 3, 2022, to commemorate 30 years since the Mabo decision. The concept of terra nullius, or land belonging to no-one, remained the legal principle on which British colonisation rested until 1992, when the High Court brought down its finding in the Mabo vs Queensland (No. That how we are managing Country is not working and things need to dramatically change. But after all his testimony, when the committee finally asked him what he proposed as a solution, all Angas could suggest was that ten percent of the colonys land not yet sold to settlers should be set aside for the use of the Aborigines. In 1827, for example, after some high-profile murders of settlers by Aborigines, the Sydney Gazette raised the question whether the murders were a perfectly natural and justifiable response to the British occupation of land belonging to the Aborigines. Milosz wrote into the horror of the 20th century as he saw war all around him. 15. The government might have discarded the doctrine only prospectively, so that only Crown land would be returned to the Aborigines, and settlers would retain title to land the Crown had already granted to them. The Proclamation of NSW Governor Richard Bourke in 1835 implemented the legal principle of terra nullius in Australian law as the basis for British settlement. ' When Robinson realized that the people under his protection evidenced a tie to their land little different from that experienced by residents of Britain, he was prompted to some pointed criticism of terra nullius. Josephine Flood, Archaeology of the Dreamtime, rev. Mabo Day is marked annually on 3 June. [2], Dhari 1907Made by AncestorTorres Strait Pigeon feathers, bamboo frame, fibre, wool, kolap (goa nut).Australian Museum Collection. Elder Waubin Richard Aken, Traditional Owner of Tuined and appointed Tribal Historian for Kaurareg First Nations people, discusses the HMB Endeavours voyage from his peoples accounts and perspectives. The HMB Endeavours voyage was originally commissioned as a scientific mission. (London: James Burns, 1845), 7273; Grahams Town Journal, 22 February 1844, CO 386/155, p. 164, PRO; Lachlan Macquarie, Journals of His Tours in New South Wales and Van Diemens Land 18101822 (Sydney: Trustees of the Public Library of New South Wales, 1956), 160. Every bit of land not in the possession of Aborigines was one more bit available for settlement. Words makaratta. These legal actions and court decisions sparked outrage among abolitionists. Everyone from the Colonial Office to the bush knew this was true. King to Bligh, n.d. 1807, Philip Gidley King Papers, C189, p. 273, ML. But Aboriginal groups were too small, and at too much of a technological disadvantage relative to the British, to be as effective. In 1979 Wiradjuri man and law student Paul Coewalked the path that Eddie Mabo would follow all the way to the High Court of Australia. Members of the expeditions tried to engage the Aborigines in trade, but reported no success. I discuss British land policy in North America in Stuart Banner, How the Indians Lost Their Land (Harvard University Press, forthcoming). The question landed on the desk of James Stephen, who would later play a big role in colonial policy as Undersecretary for the Colonies in the 1830s and 1840s, but who in 1822 was still a law clerk in the Colonial Office. Focusing on the work of Bruce Pascoe, this theme explores evidence of Indigenous agriculture and settlement in pre-colonial Australiainformation that challenges the terra nullius claim. Court cases in the mid-19th century challenged the idea of British settlement at the time the rulings were in favour of the Crown. Words. Many Americans, including free and formerly enslaved people, worked tirelessly to support the abolitionist movement. Section 1: Aboriginal history and culture, Section 2: Aboriginal cultural protocols and practices, Section 3: Initial contact and colonisation of Australia, Section 4: Exclusion, Control, Segregation and Assimilation Policies, Section 5: Aboriginal land rights and native title rights, Section 6: The fight for human rights and equality, Section 7: Self-determination and community, Section 8: Road to reconciliation, recognition and reparations, Section 9: Aboriginal people in NSW today, Section 10: Government working with community to heal. 26. The remarks of colonial governors suggest that it was motivated by precisely the feeling Angas expressedthe sense that Aborigines deserved some land because Britons had taken that on which they formerly lived. In 1814 he set aside some land for a school for Aboriginal children and some more land to be occupied and farmed by Aboriginal adults. How did the government remedy this? Other cases persisted. iPhone History: A Timeline of Every Model in Order James Campbell to Dr. Farr, 24 March 1791, Doc. The brute fact was that terra nullius, once underway, was extraordinarily difficult to reverse, because every British landowner in Australia depended on it. They were also less technologically advanced than other indigenous people the British had encountered. The exact opposite situation had arisen more than a century before in North America, where the Indians had been recognized as owners of their land. But if you see something that doesn't look right, click here to contact us! In the same year the Earl of Egremont, Secretary of State, speaking of American Indians, had emphasized the importance of guarding against any Invasion or Occupation of their Hunting Lands, the Possession of which is to be acquired by fair Purchase only. Members of the Royal Society and the government anticipated that if there really was an inhabited continent in the south Pacific, and if it turned out to be suitable for colonizing, Britain would buy it from the natives, just like it was buying North America. Since the inception of the Atlantic slave trade, which began in the 16th century, critics voiced their disapproval of the system. It seems to me almost doubtful, Lowes lawyer argued, whether taking possession of a country under these circumstances we have a right to establish empire among ourselves, and that our civil polity is for this reason repugnant to the law of nations. By that logic, the lawyer conceded, the court lacked the jurisdiction to try anyone, not just Lowe, but at the very least, he claimed, the Aborigines, being the free occupants of the demesne or soil, could not be tried in colonial courts.[54]. In the 1680s, when the imperial government briefly reorganized the administration of the New England colonies, the government announced its intention to invalidate all land titles based on pretended Purchases from Indians, on the theory that from the Indians noe title cann be Derived. The result was an uproar, led by some of the most prominent people in New England. To Cook, Aboriginal people were uncivilised hunters and gatherershe did not see evidence of settlement and farming in a form he recognised. The aboriginal natives were the primary tenants of the soil, insisted one defense lawyer; they subsisted in the woods by fishing and hunting, and it was illegal for any one to disturb them in the possession of these natural rights. His clients killing of a white man, he argued, should accordingly be classified as a defensive act of war rather than a civil homicide. The Geography of Strabo, trans. George R. Potter and Evelyn M. Simpson (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1959), 4:274; Emerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations (1758), ed. To be sure, there were advocates of terra nullius in Britain and North America, and settlers trespassed in large numbers on the Indians land. Processing and describing our collections, Indigenous Responses to Cook and his Voyage, Shoulder to Shoulder: Feminism in Australia, Depositing your personal or family papers, Immigrant diaries (1822-1895) held in the manuscript collection, Australian Centre for Paralympic Studies Oral History Project, Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants Oral History Project, "You cant forget things like that" Forgotten Australians and Former Child Migrants Oral History booklet, National History Projects - The National Library and the National Museum, Explore the pictures collection through articles and essays, A Small Town at War the Drouin Collection, John Hamilton Mortimer and the discovery of Captain Cook, The sixties through the eyes of John Mulligan, William Henry Corkhill and the Tilba Tilba Collection, Conditions for filming Pictures Collection items, Archived websites about East Timor's 2007 elections, Indonesian resources from the Dutch period, National Library of Australia's Jakarta office, Indonesia, The Clough Collection of kuchie (frontispiece prints), English language materials published in Thailand, Asian Accounts of Australia - Bibliographies, Archived websites from the Pacific Region, Badja Forest Road Fire oral history project. Stuart Banner is a professor of law at UCLA <[emailprotected]>. Across language itself. CO 1/63, pp. It would not have benefitted the tribes that most needed help, the ones unlucky enough to have had the British reach their land first. In this section, there's a wealth of information about our collections of scientific specimens and cultural objects. : Melbourne University Press, 1986), 132; Proclamation, 10 Dec. 1814, Supreme Court: Miscellaneous Correspondence Relating to Aborigines, 5/1161, 1:1617, State Records New South Wales, Sydney (hereafter SRNSW). In Britain and Australia there were vocal, powerful people, both inside and outside the government, who urged that terra nullius had been a terrible injustice to the Aborigines. The Native Blacks are I think the ugliest race I ever beheld, Ann Gore informed a friend back in England. Can we wonder then at the hatred they bear to the white inhabitants? Robinson believed that we should make some atonement for the misery we have entailed upon the original proprietors of this land. After twenty years as a missionary in New South Wales, Lancelot Threlkeld concluded that Britain owed the Aborigines the price of the Land of their Birth. A Quaker committee in London pointedly asked why the British purchased land from nomadic tribes in other colonies but seized land from the Aborigines, who consider themselves the real owners of the soil.[51] Religious groups like these were at the peak of their influence on British colonial policy. The change was not lost on members of the South Australian Colonization Commission. ] Sheridans responsehe believed the ground belonged to Governmentsuggests he understood the point the lawyer was trying to make. (Armonk, N.Y.: M. E. Sharpe, 2002), 10019; Bruce Kercher, The Recognition of Aboriginal Status and Laws in the Supreme Court of New South Wales under Forbes, CJ, 18241836, in Land and Freedom: Law, Property Rights and the British Diaspora, ed. North America had some empty places, but Australia sounded like an empty continent. [53] The first of these appears to have been the 1827 prosecution of the soldier Nathaniel Lowe for killing an Aborigine the settlers called Jackey Jackey. I like words. Macquarie had no need to say that. Justice John Willis said: "In Australia it is the colonists not the Aborigines are the foreigners.". ]: Blackfriars, 1964), 37:13; John F. Moffitt and Santiago Sebastian, O Brave New People: The European Invention of the American Indian (Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, 1996), 6975; Peter Stein, The Four Stage Theory of the Development of Societies, in The Character and Influence of the Roman Civil Law: Historical Essays (London: Hambledon Press, 1988), 395409; Adam Smith, Lectures on Jurisprudence (delivered 1760s), ed. 0000003495 00000 n 64. Join us, volunteer and be a part of our journey of discovery! Why was Australia declared 'Terra Nullius' even though the continent was already inhabited?Q4b. Europeans arrived with preconceptions, to be sure, but these were often modified by experience. 28. The statement was agreed to in 2017 by a convention of more than 250. Peter Karsten, Between Law and Custom: High and Low Legal Cultures in the Lands of the British DiasporaThe United States, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, 16001900 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002), 25661; King to Hobart, 20 Dec. 1804, Historical Records of Australia, series I, 5:166; N. J. A decade later, I was a young reporter still in my early 20s, finding my way into the foreign world of journalism when I saw a listing for a case at the High Court. The colonists always urged him to punish the Aborigines severely when they stole crops, King related, but he could never bring himself to do it. There will be many words between now and then. 50. I was no lawyerbut I knew I sensed this was different. It appears that among themselves the ground is parcelled out to individuals, and passes by inheritance, he explained. After the Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854 was passed, both pro- and anti-slavery groups inhabited the Kansas Territory. Cook also had. That was Eddie Mabos gift. In 1837, a pro-slavery mob attacked a warehouse in Alton, Illinois, in an attempt to destroy abolitionist press materials. Had they such a fixed residence previously to the settlement of any Europeans in the country?Yes, it was accurately defined; not only was the district of the tribe defined, but the districts of the families of the tribe were so also. Rights and the Oral History and Folklore Collection. all things that Pascoe argues occurred in pre-contact Australia. The establishment of terra nullius was aided by the fact that the earliest British contacts with Australia were large, well-armed expeditions controlled by the imperial government. Glen Mackie, Yam Island ManWood, glue, nails, ochre, thin steel wire, bamboo, nylon, raw cotton muslin, vinyl cut.Australian Museum Collection. Strange as it may seem, marveled the judge David Collins, they have also their real estates. I walked into the news meeting at the ABC with words. From the beginning of White settlement Aboriginals were deprived of their rights to their land. Stephen based his opinion on the same reasoning Shepherd had used to resolve the question of taxation. With reference to the instructions Cook received to gain the consent of the Indigenous inhabitants before claiming territory, research and compare the colonisation of Australia to that of New Zealand. 68. 17. That was true, Forbes explained, because New South Wales had been acquired by the act of His Majestys subjects settling an uninhabited country. The same year, in litigation over the ownership of a parcel of land in Sydney, Forbes held that the right of the soil, and of all lands in the colony, became vested immediately upon its settlement, in his Majesty. In 1839, when some doubted the authority of the colonial government to charge a fee for pasturing on Crown land, Lord Normanby, the Secretary of State for the Colonies, instructed Governor George Gipps that ownership of the Waste Lands in the Colonythat is, the lands not yet granted to settlerswas clearly in the Crown and not anyone else, including the Aborigines. The first European explorers to land in Australia did not find many people there. 0 The early colonization has resulted to extreme hardships for the people, as they've experienced various injustices, such as violence, racism and the disruption of their cultures (Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture). The Mabo decision altered the foundation of land law in Australia by overturning the doctrine of terra nullius (land belonging to no-one) on which British claims to possession of Australia were based. By the 1840s the colonial government was concerned that there were too many half-caste children being born and that many of them quickly became victims of infanticide in Aboriginal communities. Why not? If the Aborigines were still in the state of nature, then by definition they did not own their land. In 1768 the Royal Society hired James Cook to take a ship to the South Pacific to observe the transit of Venus across the sun, the measurement of which, from several parts of the world simultaneously, would help astronomers determine the distance between the sun and the earth. Had these men been exposed to a colder atmosphere, Phillip concluded, they would doubtless have had clothes and houses, before they attempted to become sculptors.[28] But whatever the reason for it, the Aborigines lack of clothing or proper houses was taken as proof of their primitiveness. Questioned by a House of Commons committee in 1841, Angas made his view clear. The 1830s and 1840s saw the rise of an active British humanitarian movement seeking to improve the conditions of indigenous people throughout the empire. They built only the most rudimentary kind of shelter, small hovels not much bigger than an oven, made of pieces of Sticks, Bark, Grass &c.;, and even these are seldom used but in the wet seasons. And most important of all, Cook explained, the Natives know nothing of Cultivation. Unlike the Indians of eastern North America, and unlike the Polynesians Cook met on the way to Australia, the Aborigines were not farmers. 8. The first was in settlements that had been conquered by force, where the king could exercise power as conqueror; the second was in settlements that had been ceded to the Crown, in which the king would succeed to the legislative power of the former sovereign. James Matra, who proposed placing a colony there in 1783, argued that among Australias advantages was that it was peopled by only a few black inhabitants, who, in the rudest state of society, knew no other arts than such as were necessary to their mere animal existence. A pamphlet of the mid-1780s urging colonization emphasized that the continent was the solitary haunt of a few miserable Savages, destitute of clothing.[22] Unlike most parts of the world, Britons could believe, Australia really was terra nullius. They had no clothing. Sadly, the verdict was passed after the death of Mabo. were 'entitled as against the whole world to possession, occupation, use and enjoyment of (most of) the lands of the Murray Islands'. No farms, no houses, no clothescould a people be any more savage? C. E. Sayers (Melbourne: Wren Publishing, 1973), 8487. The answer will be obvious to anyone familiar with present-day litigation over indigenous peoples land claims in former British colonies. The Australian Museum respects and acknowledges the Gadigalpeople as the FirstPeoples and Traditional Custodians of the land andwaterways on which theMuseumstands.